of accuration of
his
kind
nou
ought
I
think to have made up
his mind to prove
to
hamvin
quit the office from which
he has made them. Mr.
Anokery has not only failin
of his
to prove the woot
charges but has failed to
prove
that he had
any
reasonable excuse for
bringing them forward.
appears
to
me
in
the
294
me
by Lii. John Bowring.
But this is not all.
a
Mr. Anstey appears to
course of the enquiring
to have committed a breach
of officice propriety which the absence of strong
claims
account
on ac
good character).
f
previous
woned be
alone a sufficient reason
شمال
f
fou
his dismissal.
that dimifere
is the natural penalty of
failure.
car
the
And in the prevent
reasons for not
remetting that penalty
are
strengthened by
Mr.
the
previous history of on. Ansteig
career at
Itong Kong if
t
is at all correctly spilomyed.
by
It will be seen
ان
reference to page 48 of the
printed
༡
evidence that Mr.
Anstey volunteered a state-
ment that
his arrival
in the Colony the Couran
fram
confidentially off course
pleased to lament the corrupt sare of the Hong Government
ent and
Health
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.